Defence financing in the EU: Needs, ambitions and progress

Jun 15, 2026
Defence financing in the EU: Needs, ambitions and progress PUBLICATION
Photo credits: GLOBSEC
Philipp Lausberg
Senior Policy Analyst

The Council's agreement last week on the AGILE mandate – opening trilogue on a €115 million programme designed to get disruptive defence innovations from lab to deployment in weeks rather than years - puts a sharp spotlight on the questions: is Europe actually financing its defence the right way?

This paper for GLOBSEC’s competitiveness tracker takes stock and argues that the honest answer is: not yet.

The EU-27 collectively outspend both Russia and China on defence. Yet fragmented procurement, duplicated programmes, and nationally siloed forces mean Europe gets far less capability per euro than those numbers suggest. Multiple allied assessments point to roughly €250 billion per year in additional outlays this decade to achieve credible deterrence by 2030 – and Europe's actual needs may run closer to €1.25 trillion. The tools now in place – SAFE loans, the fiscal escape clause, EDIP – are real steps, but they cover only a fraction of what is needed.

The paper argues for concrete solutions along five dimensions of financing:

  • ramping up spending;

  • pooling and focusing investment;

  • standardising and simplifying rules;

  • Europeanising sourcing to reduce dependence on non-EU suppliers (78% of weapons procurement came from outside the EU in 2022–23);

  • crowding in more private capital

The financing architecture is taking shape, but delivery remains patchy and political will to treat defence as a European public good – requiring pooled sovereignty and aligned fiscal priorities – is not yet there.

The paper was originally published by GLOBSEC.

 Read the full paper here. 

Philipp Lausberg is a Senior Policy Analyst in the European Political Economy Programme at the European Policy Centre and leads the EPC’s EU sanctions project.

The support the European Policy Centre receives for its ongoing operations, or specifically for its publications, does not constitute an endorsement of their contents, which reflect the views of the authors only. Supporters and partners cannot be held responsible for any use that may be made of the information contained therein.

Related publications

COMPENDIUM
Jun 15, 2026
by Amanda Paul, Svitlana Taran, Juraj Majcin, Iana Maisuradze, Christian Mölling, Jamie Shea, Paul Taylor, Almut Möller, HE Tacan Ildem, Oana Lungescu, Benedetta Berti, Chris Kremidas-Courtney, Torben Schütz, Ricardo Borges de Castro, Jennifer Kavanagh, Mihai Sebastian Chihaia, Danylo Dugin
COMMENTARY
Jun 10, 2026
by Virginie Jacob, Helena Hahn, Alberto-Horst Neidhardt

By the same authors

This website uses cookies. By continuing to use this website you are giving consent to cookies being used. More information is available in our Privacy Policy