Yermak’s exit: Rise of institutional accountability in Ukraine?
Following recent searches of Andriy Yermak’s apartment by Ukraine’s anti-corruption agencies, President Volodymyr Zelenskyy announced that Yermak had submitted his resignation and was relieved of his duties as Head of the Office of the President. During wartime, this role had become the most influential position in Ukraine – a status shaped largely by Yermak himself. Yermak’s departure marks a defining moment in Ukraine’s political evolution and underscores the growing strength of the country’s democratic institutions.
Even as an emerging democracy, Ukraine has shown that its institutions can act independently, even when scrutinising one of the most powerful figures in the country. In recent weeks, anti-corruption investigators have linked several high-profile figures to an alleged $100 million embezzlement scheme in the energy sector. The investigation, which triggered the resignation of several ministers and probes into close allies of Zelenskyy, demonstrates a system capable of enforcing accountability without waiting for foreign oversight or intervention. This moment reflects the maturation of Ukrainian governance and highlights the progress in transparency, civil-society empowerment, institutional capacity and prioritisation of defense amid Russia’s ongoing war.
Although the decision came late, President Zelenskyy ultimately made the right call. By refreshing the leadership of the Office of the President, he now has an opportunity to appoint a skilled professional who can inject credibility, expertise and renewed energy into governance. The challenge ahead will be ensuring that appointments are based on competence rather than personal loyalty – a critical step in Ukraine’s political development.
This transition is more than a personnel change; it is a statement about the resilience and independence of Ukraine’s democratic and anti-corruption systems. It also stands in sharp contrast to Russia, where such accountability and institutional renewal remains unimaginable. Yermak’s dismissal does not guarantee immediate improvements in executive governance, and Zelenskyy will have to navigate the complex legacy that Yermak leaves behind by appointing someone who will not attempt to consolidate power. The successor must be someone international partners trust and who can navigate the Office of the President out of recurring corruption scandals and public mistrust.
By embracing transparency and making difficult but necessary decisions, Ukraine continues to demonstrate that even in wartime, democratic principles can guide governance and offer hope for a more effective, capable state.
Lev Zinchenko is a former Programme Assistant with the Europe in the World Programme and Advocacy Program Coordinator at Razom for Ukraine.
The support the European Policy Centre receives for its ongoing operations, or specifically for its publications, does not constitute an endorsement of their contents, which reflect the views of the authors only. Supporters and partners cannot be held responsible for any use that may be made of the information contained therein.
